Some capitalistic recollect!

Well, this recession has given me a lot of time, thanks to the great capitalist concept of lay-offs. So I’m getting some time to do my favourite thing, rumination! I am prone to pretty weird ideas and people close to me can corroborate that. I have been saying in my previous blogs that, it seems the ‘self proclaimed’ greatest capitalist nation - USA has been trying to solve all its capitalist follies by finding solution the communist way. Just look at AIG, Bank of America, and not to mention GM asking for more & more Federal bailouts. All these corporations have been greatest loss maker in the current financial downturn. Well to be precise, GM has been the laggard for a lot longer time, making spectacular losses for nearly a decade now. The very existence of the firm amazes me. Why have they not filed for bankruptcy at the start of this millennium & handed over the assets to a more efficient user like Toyota for crying out loud? What’s wrong in that, especially in the light of US not minding in financing the Federal budget deficit by selling their papers to more efficient (capital surplus) countries like Japan or China (more than $1.5 trillion combined)?

This brings me to my prime objective behind this article, if you really believe in Capitalism then why on earth you are relying on the Communist way to fix up the mess you created with your belief. Why not go back to ground zero & start looking for the clues to rebuild it. I am a firm Capitalist believer & I can’t even stand the idea of Communism. Just to strike an analogy, Capitalism relying in Communism for rescue out of the current financial mess is like Man relying on God to rescue him from the global warming situation. If you have got yourself into this deep trouble then you better think fast & stick to the basics. Well, I’m not just complaining about the situation, I actually have a probable solution in mind.

The fundamental of Capitalism is the Capital of the organization, the entrepreneur willing to take risk for the ideas he believe in. Putting his money & skills to the work to earn profits & name for him. He also can avail loans from financial organizations like Banks or VCs/PEs for funding the cause, but even they ask for the commitment from the entrepreneur in the form of initial investment. Now just look at the Feds from Capitalistic point of view, they are an organization, they have objective, they have budgets, but where is the capital (I mean Owned funds, not Capital Receipts)? In light of the latest budget proposed by Obama Government, which predicted a deficit to the tune of $1.75 trillion or 12.5% of GDP, isn’t this the most inefficient way of running the organization? Now my question is who made the rule that Government has to run only on debt? Why can’t Governments have owned funds? Why Governments can’t be run like non-profit organizations where they are accountable, even though they are not there to make profits but they have to break-even their operations in a consistent manner? Why the same does not apply to the Governments?

Many developing economies are run in the same manner, Deficit budgeting & Inflationary economy are their USPs. Given the situation of global financial systems, there needs a lot to be done to make good the losses made in foolhardy ventures taken over by umpteen organizations. If the Governments are bailing those organizations out, they can ask for capital in return to fund all the deficits they are bearing for the bail-outs. Otherwise this deficit can lead to another calamity in making; we could enter into galloping inflation worldwide, given the short supply of the resources. The point of contention is why the Governments have to be Communistic in design when the whole economy is strong Capitalistic in nature? Desperate times call for desperate measures, but then why not be desperate the Capitalistic way? I believe there are still many strong Capitalistic believers in US who could be willing to take the risk for their belief. So why not let the entrepreneurs do their bit for the revival of the economy? Why not look at the option of running the Government the Capitalistic way? Worth a shot?

One of my friends suggested me this link which corroborates my view.